49101-evans.q41

Share/Save

Download

d, 1998; Green- wald, 1998; Saltzstein, Ting, and Saltzstein, 2001). Yet despite the popularity of flextime, accumulating evidence suggests that no more than a quarter of all eligible employ- ees take advantage of the offering (Galinsky, Bond, and Fried- man, 1993; Bond, Galinsky, and Swanberg, 1998; Eaton, 2000; Mead et al., 2000; Golden, 2001; Blair-Loy and Whar- ton, 2002). Employees are even less likely to use other pro- grams that support greater temporal flexibility, such as the option to work from home or take maternity or paternity leave (Bond, Galinsky, and Swanberg, 1998; O’Mahony and Barley, 1999; Mead et al., 2000). The discrepancy between employees’ professed desire for greater flexibility and their relatively low rates of using flex- time has puzzled researchers and policy makers. Some ana- lysts maintain that the gap simply indicates that people are unable to afford time off from work because of debt, low salaries, and norms of consumption (Schor, 1991). Most researc

Download